NSE F&O · Positioning State

Positioning-State Watchlist

Deterministic rules, no scores · crowded, coiled and early-build states per session — and how they played out.

Session
Name last 10 sessions when a name is picked
Sector
How to read it. The engine measures the crowd’s mark-to-market: it builds each crowd’s VWAP basis over its current accumulation episode (OI-trough → today, rollover-aware) and asks how far spot has moved from that average, and on the winning or losing side. Vulnerable = a one-sided crowd whose book is thinning, with near-money opposite-side option-writing fuel. Two ways in: trapped — the crowd is losing by more than half of its implied move (a losing short covers into a squeeze, a losing long capitulates); or winning but thinning — the crowd banks profit as the catalyst fades and pulls its support, a shallower move the same way. Early-build = fresh committed flow, OI still low, crowd near their average entry (hasn’t run) — positioning ahead of the move, to ride with. ⚑ Review = the net-OI read isn’t trustworthy (churn on volume / two-sided build) — escalated for your call, not force-stamped. The spark stays exogenous; this is state, not a directional prediction.
⚡ Igniting now — 5 · the crowd has started to exit (futures covering with the thesis). Pinned to the top of the vulnerable lists below. Live context, not a hit-rate edge (~14% ≈ baseline forward).
AUBANKNHPCBANKBARODAASTRALTVSMOTOR
⚠ Self-correction — 9 NEW · 3 still failing
Names we backed to ride WITH, now moving against that call. NEW = just caught, worth a look. Still failing = same call, still bad, shown again until it clears.
new today — 9
ZYDUSLIFELONG-4.4%crowd losing ground (-3% → +1% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (96→4%ile) · crowd exiting · new money turned bearish · flagged 09-28
INDIANBLONG-4.1%crowd losing ground (-2% → +4% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (73→50%ile) · crowd exiting · flagged 09-22
ADANIPOWERSHORT-2.7%crowd losing ground (-3% → -1% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (100→96%ile) · crowd exiting · flagged 09-29
ETERNALLONG-2.7%crowd losing ground (+3% → +6% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (65→4%ile) · crowd exiting · flagged 09-29
GLENMARKLONG-2.7%crowd losing ground (+3% → +4% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (12→4%ile) · crowd exiting · flagged 09-29
SUNPHARMALONG-2.4%crowd losing ground (-0% → +1% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (77→62%ile) · crowd exiting · flagged 09-29
AUROPHARMALONG-2.1%crowd losing ground (-0% → +2% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (100→85%ile) · crowd exiting · flagged 09-29
IREDASHORT-1.5%crowd gaining ground (+0% → -2% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (92→4%ile) · crowd exiting · new money turned bullish · flagged 09-22
MOTHERSONSHORT-1.5%crowd losing ground (+0% → +2% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (100→8%ile) · crowd exiting · flagged 09-29
still failing — 3
KAYNESSHORT-2.5%crowd losing ground (-2% → +1% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (100→15%ile) · crowd exiting · flagged 09-22
PIDILITINDLONG-2.5%crowd gaining ground (+3% → -7% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (42→12%ile) · crowd exiting · new money turned bearish · flagged 09-28
360ONELONG-1.5%crowd gaining ground (+5% → -0% vs avg entry) · position building (88→92%ile) · new money turned bearish · flagged 09-28
FRAMEWORK CROSS-CHECK11

Names in both the positioning map and the framework scan — positioning state vs the framework’s final call (● green = leans agree · red = tension).

NamePositioningFramework call
360ONE heldREVIEWSHORT · ARM gate · chain CONTESTED/NEUTRAL
● FORCEMOT heldBUYERLONG · ARM gate · chain STRONG/WITH
IDFCFIRSTB heldCOVERSHORT · ARM gate · chain STRONG/WITH
● PATANJALI heldBUYERSHORT · ARM gate · chain CONTESTED/NEUTRAL
● HEROMOTOCO heldBUYERLONG · SKIP gate · chain STRONG/AGAINST
● HYUNDAI heldBUYERSHORT · SKIP gate · chain LEAN/AGAINST
● RADICO heldEARLY-SLONG · SKIP gate · chain STRONG/AGAINST
● APLAPOLLOBUYERLONG · ARM gate · chain STRONG/WITH
KOTAKBANKREVIEWLONG · ARM gate · chain CONTESTED/NEUTRAL
● TVSMOTORSQUEEZELONG · ARM gate · chain STRONG/WITH
CIPLAREVIEWLONG · SKIP gate · chain STRONG/AGAINST
DONE — spent, no action1
NHPC — flagged 2026-09-29 → done, moved 1.0× its implied.
SQUEEZE-VULNERABLE73 new/changed · 4 continuing

One-sided SHORT book — trapped (spot above their basis) OR draining (covering) — with call-writing fuel; up-squeeze risk if sparked

AUBANK⚡ ARMEDspot 1012IV 29implied ±4.8%shorts up 2.1% on their avg sell (₹1033) · book thinning
↳ igniting +1.2% in-thesis since 09-29 · crowd losing ground (-3% → -2% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (100→73%ile) · crowd exiting

Crowded/thin short. Spot sits 2.1% below the short crowd's VWAP basis (₹1033) — the shorts are in profit and the book is thinning (covering, net -1.2% over 10d) — as the setup fades they buy back and their offer lifts; a shallower squeeze than a trapped one, but still up-pressure. OI at the 73th-%ile of its 25-day range, 87% of the build-episode was short-side. Near-money call-writing above spot is the accelerant — on a bounce those writers must buy to hedge, feeding the up-move.

7d regime: short-build 44% / short-cover 56% · short-cover 41→56% — IN PROGRESS (cover took the regime) · OI 73%ile of 25d · shorts up 2.1% on avg sell 1033 (spot 1012) · confidence LOW-CONF: the shorts are in profit — likelier orderly profit-taking than a forced squeeze · skew +4.8v
chain now skew +4.8v · ceiling 1040 (940k) ERODING dom1.41× · floor 1000 (786k) ERODING dom1.23×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1020CE bought ₹29.8L (+1.2% OTM, +3.1v) ✓ confirms
TVSMOTOR⚡ ARMEDspot 4144IV 28implied ±4.8%shorts up 0.5% on their avg sell (₹4163) · book thinning
↳ igniting -0.5% in-thesis since 09-29 · crowd losing ground (-1% → -0% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (65→23%ile) · crowd exiting

Crowded/thin short. Spot sits 0.5% below the short crowd's VWAP basis (₹4163) — the shorts are in profit and the book is thinning (covering, net -2.5% over 10d) — as the setup fades they buy back and their offer lifts; a shallower squeeze than a trapped one, but still up-pressure. OI at the 23th-%ile of its 25-day range, 100% of the build-episode was short-side. Near-money call-writing above spot is the accelerant — on a bounce those writers must buy to hedge, feeding the up-move.

7d regime: short-build 38% / short-cover 60% · short-cover 46→60% — IN PROGRESS (cover took the regime) · OI 23%ile of 25d · shorts up 0.5% on avg sell 4163 (spot 4144) · confidence LOW-CONF: the shorts are in profit — likelier orderly profit-taking than a forced squeeze · skew -2.0v
chain now skew -2.0v · ceiling 4200 (255k) dom1.87× · floor 4000 (132k) RELOCATING dom1.06×
⚑ also abnormal flow 4200CE bought ₹1.16cr (+2.3% OTM, +1.1v) ✓ confirms  ·  4150PE bought ₹79.9L (-0.5% OTM, +3.0v) ⚔ contrary
BANKBARODA⚡ ARMEDspot 233IV 25implied ±4.2%shorts up 0.5% on their avg sell (₹234) · book thinning
↳ igniting +0.5% in-thesis since 09-29 · crowd losing ground (-2% → -0% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (96→19%ile) · crowd exiting

Crowded/thin short. Spot sits 0.5% below the short crowd's VWAP basis (₹234) — the shorts are in profit and the book is thinning (covering, net -0.6% over 10d) — as the setup fades they buy back and their offer lifts; a shallower squeeze than a trapped one, but still up-pressure. OI at the 19th-%ile of its 25-day range, 74% of the build-episode was short-side. Near-money call-writing above spot is the accelerant — on a bounce those writers must buy to hedge, feeding the up-move. A wall move against price (divergent) reinforces the read.

7d regime: short-build 35% / short-cover 52% · short-cover 39→52% — IN PROGRESS (cover took the regime) · OI 19%ile of 25d · shorts up 0.5% on avg sell 234 (spot 233) · confidence LOW-CONF: the shorts are in profit — likelier orderly profit-taking than a forced squeeze · floor↑ +17.3% real DIVERGENT(price↓) · skew -0.2v
chain now skew -0.2v · ceiling 240 (8433k) ERODING dom2.02× · floor 280 (6134k) dom1.05×

continuing (4): HDFCBANK d8, KEI d6, NIFTYFPI d4, POWERINDIA d2

UNWIND-VULNERABLE21 new/changed · 1 continuing

One-sided LONG book — trapped (spot below their basis) OR draining (profit-taking) — with put-writing fuel; down-unwind risk if sparked

ASTRAL⚡ ARMEDspot 1372IV 25implied ±4.2%longs down 2.6% on their avg buy (₹1409) · trapped, book thinning
↳ igniting +0.1% in-thesis since 09-29 · crowd gaining ground (+3% → +3% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (23→4%ile) · crowd exiting

Crowded/thin long. Spot sits 2.6% below the long crowd's VWAP basis (₹1409) — the longs are underwater, primed to capitulate. OI at the 4th-%ile, 75% of the build was long-side. Near-money put-writing below spot is the accelerant — on a fade those writers must sell to hedge, feeding the down-move.

7d regime: long-build 30% / long-unwind 61% · long-unwind rising 0→61% (shift ≥2σ 16pp) — IN PROGRESS (unwind took the regime) · OI 4%ile of 25d · longs down 2.7% on avg buy 1409 (spot 1372) · confidence HIGH-CONF: the longs are underwater — a losing crowd inverting has the most left to cover · ceiling↓ -14.6% real · floor↓ -7.3% real · skew +2.5v
chain now skew +2.5v · ceiling 1400 (223k) dom1.33× · floor 1400 (136k) dom1.26×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1360CE bought ₹10.5L (-1.3% OTM, +2.0v) ⚔ contrary  ·  1380CE bought ₹8.2L (+0.5% OTM, +1.0v) ⚔ contrary

continuing (1): GODFRYPHLP d2

EARLY-BUILD-LONG172 new/changed · 15 continuing

Fresh committed longs, OI has room, near their basis (hasn't run) — ride with

COALINDIAspot 426IV 20implied ±3.3%LONG 93% · off -0.6%

Fresh accumulation. 93% committed long build, OI still low (12th-%ile = room), and the crowd is near their average entry (spot only 0.6% from their avg buy — hasn't run yet; net +1.6% = 0.5× its implied move). Positioning ahead of the move, not the exhausted end — ride with it if it persists.

7d regime: long-build 60% / long-unwind 21% · long-build rising 0→60% (shift ≥2σ 20pp) — CONFIRMED (crossed 50% — regime handover) · OI 12%ile of 25d · longs up 0.6% on avg buy 423 (spot 426) · floor↑ +7.1% real · ceiling↑ +2.4% real
chain now skew +1.1v · ceiling 430 (2831k) dom1.33× · floor 430 (2028k) dom1.34×
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has climbed 2.4% over 17 days in a row, but the stock moved about the same (+2.8%) — the ceiling is just tracking price
  • the floor has climbed 7.1% over 6 days in a row, while the stock moved +2.9% over that stretch
  • the longs just flipped to winning — now up 0.6% on their average buy price (was down 2.3%), first time in 8 days
  • open futures positions grew 6.1% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
  • long positions jumped 6.4% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price rose that day it was fresh buying
PIDILITINDspot 1479IV 20implied ±3.2%LONG 60% · off -6.7%

Fresh accumulation. 60% committed long build, OI still low (12th-%ile = room), and the crowd is near their average entry (spot only 6.7% from their avg buy — hasn't run yet; net -5.3% = 1.7× its implied move). Positioning ahead of the move, not the exhausted end — ride with it if it persists.

7d regime: long-build 51% / long-unwind 46% · long-build 46→51% — CONFIRMED (crossed 50% — regime handover) · OI 12%ile of 25d · crowd's avg entry unreadable this session
chain now skew -1.3v · ceiling 1500 (182k) dom1.07× · floor 1500 (137k) ERODING dom1.83×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1480PE bought ₹5.9L (-0.1% OTM, +6.3v) ⚔ contrary  ·  1500PE writer-cover ₹4.8L (-0.4% OTM, +8.5v) ⚔ contrary
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 13.7% over 4 days in a row, while the stock moved -6.7% over that stretch
  • the shorts just flipped to winning — now up 6.7% on their average sell price (was down 3.4%), first time in 3 days
  • open futures positions shrank 0.1% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts closing out
  • meanwhile the stock is -5.3% over the last 10 trading days
  • short positions jumped 3.2% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since

continuing (15): ETERNAL d6, GLENMARK d6, IOC d6, MCX d6, MOTILALOFS d6, NMDC d6, PAGEIND d6, VMM d5, ADANIPORTS d2, AUROPHARMA d2, BHEL d2, INDHOTEL d2, JSWSTEEL d2, SONACOMS d2, SUNPHARMA d2

EARLY-BUILD-SHORT285 new/changed · 23 continuing

Fresh committed shorts, OI has room, near their basis — ride with (down)

MPHASISspot 2172IV 35implied ±5.8%SHORT 88% · off -4.2%

Fresh distribution. 88% committed short build, OI low (77th-%ile = room), crowd near their average entry (spot only 4.2% from their avg sell — hasn't run yet; net -6.3% = 1.1× its implied move). Early short-side positioning, not the late end.

7d regime: short-build 70% / long-build 28% · short-build 49→70% — CONFIRMED (crossed 50% — regime handover) · OI 77%ile of 25d · shorts up 4.2% on avg sell 2268 (spot 2172) · ceiling↓ -9.3% real · floor↓ -13.9% real
chain now skew -2.3v · ceiling 2300 (120k) ERODING dom1.04× · floor 2100 (128k) RELOCATING dom1.45×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2100PE bought ₹54.7L (+2.4% OTM, +2.1v) ✓ confirms  ·  2200PE bought ₹29.9L (-0.5% OTM, +4.6v) ✓ confirms
RADICOspot 4410IV 30implied ±5.0%SHORT 84% · off -0.1%

Fresh distribution. 84% committed short build, OI low (88th-%ile = room), crowd near their average entry (spot only 0.1% from their avg sell — hasn't run yet; net +0.2% = 0.0× its implied move). Early short-side positioning, not the late end.

7d regime: short-build 64% / long-unwind 17% · short-build rising 0→64% (shift ≥2σ 18pp) — CONFIRMED (crossed 50% — regime handover) · OI 88%ile of 25d · shorts up 0.1% on avg sell 4417 (spot 4410) · floor↓ -2.3% real
chain now skew -5.3v · ceiling 5000 (193k) BUILDING dom2.72× · floor 4400 (53k) ERODING dom2.17×
⚑ also abnormal flow 4500PE bought ₹27.8L (-0.4% OTM, +16.4v) ✓ confirms  ·  4600CE bought ₹19.0L (+2.6% OTM, +1.1v) ⚔ contrary
what has been moving
  • the ceiling had been sliding down for 23 days, then turned up 13.7% today, while the stock moved -5.4% over that stretch
  • the shorts are up 0.1% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 13.2% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts piling in
  • put-vs-call skew has eased (+2.4 → -5.3 over 3 days) — fear coming out of puts (context only, not a vote)
  • short positions jumped 11.8% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
BOSCHLTDspot 47370IV 24implied ±4.0%SHORT 100% · off +1.3%

Fresh distribution. 100% committed short build, OI low (4th-%ile = room), crowd near their average entry (spot only 1.3% from their avg sell — hasn't run yet; net -1.3% = 0.3× its implied move). Early short-side positioning, not the late end.

7d regime: short-build 51% / short-cover 30% / long-build 17% · short-build rising 9→51% (shift ≥2σ 17pp) — CONFIRMED (crossed 50% — regime handover) · OI 4%ile of 25d · shorts down 1.3% on avg sell 46773 (spot 47370) · ceiling↓ -2.1% real
chain now skew +0.2v · ceiling 50000 (10k) ERODING dom1.53× · floor 44000 (15k) ERODING dom1.87×
⚑ also abnormal flow 46500PE bought ₹17.3L (+1.4% OTM, +12.0v) ✓ confirms  ·  44000PE bought ₹15.4L (+7.0% OTM, +10.4v) ✓ confirms
LTspot 3763IV 20implied ±3.3%SHORT 100% · off +0.0%

Fresh distribution. 100% committed short build, OI low (23th-%ile = room), crowd near their average entry (spot only 0.0% from their avg sell — hasn't run yet; net -2.4% = 0.7× its implied move). Early short-side positioning, not the late end.

7d regime: short-build 68% / short-cover 29% · short-build rising 26→68% (shift ≥2σ 11pp) — CONFIRMED (crossed 50% — regime handover) · OI 23%ile of 25d · shorts down 0.0% on avg sell 3763 (spot 3763) · floor↓ -5.3% real
chain now skew +4.5v · ceiling 4000 (1078k) ERODING dom1.59× · floor 3800 (587k) dom1.03×
what has been moving
  • the shorts just flipped to losing — now down 0.0% on their average sell price (was up 1.6%), first time in 1 day
  • open futures positions grew 3.0% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts piling in
  • short positions jumped 5.9% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
BANKNIFTYspot 55006IV 15implied ±2.5%SHORT 100% · off -1.6%

Fresh distribution. 100% committed short build, OI low (81th-%ile = room), crowd near their average entry (spot only 1.6% from their avg sell — hasn't run yet; net -2.3% = 0.9× its implied move). Early short-side positioning, not the late end.

7d regime: short-build 68% / short-cover 29% · short-build rising 36→68% (shift ≥2σ 10pp) — CONFIRMED (crossed 50% — regime handover) · OI 81%ile of 25d · shorts up 1.6% on avg sell 55880 (spot 55006)
chain now skew +2.8v · ceiling 58000 (2032k) ERODING dom1.14× · floor 58000 (1466k) dom1.72×
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has climbed 0.9% over 8 days in a row, while the stock moved -2.3% over that stretch
  • the floor has climbed 0.9% over 6 days in a row, while the stock moved -2.9% over that stretch
  • the shorts are up 1.6% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 9.6% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts piling in
  • meanwhile the stock is -2.3% over the last 10 trading days
  • short positions jumped 4.9% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since

continuing (23): CANBK d7, PFC d7, RECLTD d7, HINDPETRO d6, SHRIRAMFIN d6, SUZLON d6, SAGILITY d5, ADANIPOWER d4, BAJAJFINSV d2, CAMS d2, CUMMINSIND d2, DIVISLAB d2, EICHERMOT d2, HDFCAMC d2, HINDUNILVR d2, MAHABANK d2, MAXHEALTH d2, MOTHERSON d2, OBEROIRLTY d2, PREMIERENE d2, SBIN d2, TIINDIA d2, TITAN d2

ABNORMAL FLOW — BUYERS & COVERERS7171 new/changed · 0 continuing

Informed flow — BUYERS paying up (excess-IV) to OPEN a convex reach (defined-risk, asymmetric; scored on expectancy) AND COVERERS shedding material OI to CLOSE (writers buying back = cap lifting / holders taking profit = crowd leaving; an exit signal, not scored). Each row tagged.

TVSMOTORCOVER · HOLDER-COVER · bullish⚡ ARMEDspot 4144IV 28implied ±4.8%PE cover @ 3950 · 0.79×impl · excess-IV -4.9v · ₹22.3LOK
↷ changed from SQUEEZE-VULNERABLE (that tag first given 1d ago)
↳ igniting -0.5% in-thesis since 09-29 · crowd losing ground (-1% → -0% vs avg entry) · position shrinking (65→23%ile) · crowd exiting

Informed unwind (COVER). PE holders are taking profit — excess-IV -4.9v (IV fell as longs sold to close), the bears are leaving. Reads bullish. A OK unwind (₹22.3L, 131% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

PE cover @ 3950 · HOLDER-COVER — holders taking profit (bulls/bears leaving) · bullish · excess-IV -4.9v · ₹22.3L / 42,875 OI-shed = 131% of strike OI
chain now skew -2.0v · ceiling 4200 (255k) dom1.87× · floor 4000 (132k) RELOCATING dom1.06×
⚑ also abnormal flow 4200CE bought ₹1.16cr (+2.3% OTM, +1.1v)  ·  4150PE bought ₹79.9L (-0.5% OTM, +3.0v)
WAAREEENERBUYER · bullishspot 2377IV 45implied ±7.6%CE buyer @ 2600 · 1.25×impl · excess-IV +2.8v · ₹9.5LOK

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.8v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.25× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹9.5L, 34% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 2600 · excess-IV +2.8v (intensity) · ₹9.5L / 58,100 OI-add = 34% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +3.7v · ceiling 2500 (283k) dom1.27× · floor 2500 (215k) ERODING dom1.35×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2300PE bought ₹16.4L (+3.2% OTM, +1.7v)
IREDABUYER · bearishspot 109IV 43implied ±7.1%PE buyer @ 105 · 0.84×impl · excess-IV +1.8v · ₹18.7LMEDIUM
↷ changed from ABNORMAL-COVER (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +1.8v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 0.84× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹18.7L, 39% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 105 · excess-IV +1.8v (intensity) · ₹18.7L / 882,375 OI-add = 39% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +28.6v · ceiling 115 (7226k) dom1.21× · floor 110 (6059k) dom1.42×
⚑ also abnormal flow 105PE bought ₹18.3L (+6.0% OTM, +1.3v)
what has been moving
  • the shorts just flipped to winning — now up 1.7% on their average sell price (was down 0.1%), first time in 8 days
  • open futures positions shrank 23.9% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts closing out
  • put-vs-call skew has risen (+4.7 → +28.6 over 2 days) — fear building into puts (context only, not a vote)
KALYANKJILBUYER · bullishspot 556IV 42implied ±7.0%CE buyer @ 600 · 1.21×impl · excess-IV +4.8v · ₹40.1LLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +4.8v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.21× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹40.1L, 17% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 600 · excess-IV +4.8v (intensity) · ₹40.1L / 395,550 OI-add = 17% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -1.3v · ceiling 600 (2294k) ERODING dom1.77× · floor 540 (1228k) RELOCATING dom1.02×
⚑ also abnormal flow 570PE bought ₹96.9L (-2.6% OTM, +1.3v)  ·  540PE bought ₹33.7L (+3.8% OTM, +1.5v)
KALYANKJILCOVER · WRITER-COVER · bearishspot 556IV 42implied ±7.0%PE cover @ 520 · 0.86×impl · excess-IV +1.5v · ₹44.3LMEDIUM

Informed unwind (COVER). PE writers are buying back — excess-IV +1.5v (IV rose vs surface as they paid up to close), so the floor is being pulled. Reads bearish — a wall coming off in the crowd's face (capitulation). A MEDIUM unwind (₹44.3L, 39% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

PE cover @ 520 · WRITER-COVER — writers buying back (cap lifting / floor pulled) · bearish · excess-IV +1.5v · ₹44.3L / 402,300 OI-shed = 39% of strike OI
chain now skew -1.3v · ceiling 600 (2294k) ERODING dom1.77× · floor 540 (1228k) RELOCATING dom1.02×
⚑ also abnormal flow 570PE bought ₹96.9L (-2.6% OTM, +1.3v)  ·  540PE bought ₹33.7L (+3.8% OTM, +1.5v)
MAZDOCKBUYER · bullishspot 2114IV 40implied ±6.7%CE buyer @ 2250 · 0.97×impl · excess-IV +2.8v · ₹37.4LLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.8v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.97× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹37.4L, 50% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 2250 · excess-IV +2.8v (intensity) · ₹37.4L / 137,475 OI-add = 50% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +3.8v · ceiling 2500 (410k) ERODING dom1.21× · floor 2100 (414k) RELOCATING dom1.38×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2250PE writer-cover ₹1.83cr (-6.8% OTM, +7.5v)  ·  2150PE writer-cover ₹1.12cr (-2.0% OTM, +4.3v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 4.7% over 14 days in a row, while the stock moved -12.2% over that stretch
  • the floor has slid down 14.2% over 11 days in a row, while the stock moved -5.3% over that stretch
  • the longs just flipped to losing — now down 3.6% on their average buy price (was up 5.7%), first time in 7 days
  • open futures positions grew 0.2% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
MAZDOCKCOVER · WRITER-COVER · bearishspot 2114IV 40implied ±6.7%PE cover @ 2150 · -0.26×impl · excess-IV +2.9v · ₹1.11crMEDIUM

Informed unwind (COVER). PE writers are buying back — excess-IV +2.9v (IV rose vs surface as they paid up to close), so the floor is being pulled. Reads bearish — a wall coming off in the crowd's face (capitulation). A MEDIUM unwind (₹1.11cr, 87% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

PE cover @ 2150 · WRITER-COVER — writers buying back (cap lifting / floor pulled) · bearish · excess-IV +2.9v · ₹1.11cr / 128,475 OI-shed = 87% of strike OI
chain now skew +3.8v · ceiling 2500 (410k) ERODING dom1.21× · floor 2100 (414k) RELOCATING dom1.38×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2250PE writer-cover ₹1.83cr (-6.8% OTM, +7.5v)  ·  2150PE writer-cover ₹1.12cr (-2.0% OTM, +4.3v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 4.7% over 14 days in a row, while the stock moved -12.2% over that stretch
  • the floor has slid down 14.2% over 11 days in a row, while the stock moved -5.3% over that stretch
  • the longs just flipped to losing — now down 3.6% on their average buy price (was up 5.7%), first time in 7 days
  • open futures positions grew 0.2% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
IDEABUYER · bullishspot 13IV 39implied ±6.5%vol / strangle @ 14 · 1.25×impl · excess-IV +3.8v · ₹2.21crLARGEVOL two-sided
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 6d ago)

Vol / two-sided bet. Comparable reach buyers on BOTH sides — someone paying up (excess-IV +3.8v) for a big move EITHER way, ~1.25× the implied weekly move out. A straddle/strangle vol bet, not directional — no LONG/SHORT read. This is a LARGE position (₹2.21cr, 23% of the strike's OI) — Excluded from directional expectancy; surfaced because the size expects a move.

CE buyer @ 14 · excess-IV +3.8v (intensity) · ₹2.21cr / 88,557,525 OI-add = 23% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +0.8v · ceiling 15 (425777k) ERODING dom1.02× · floor 14 (281040k) ERODING dom1.19×
⚑ also abnormal flow 14CE bought ₹2.54cr (+8.1% OTM, +2.1v)  ·  15CE bought ₹85.7L (+15.8% OTM, +2.0v)
what has been moving
  • the longs are down 7.9% on their average buy price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 4.8% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
  • long positions jumped 1.3% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price rose that day it was fresh buying, and the price has turned against them since
ANGELONEBUYER · bullishspot 276IV 38implied ±6.3%CE buyer @ 300 · 1.51×impl · excess-IV +5.7v · ₹13.1LMEDIUM
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 2d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +5.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.51× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹13.1L, 13% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 300 · excess-IV +5.7v (intensity) · ₹13.1L / 370,000 OI-add = 13% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -2.1v · ceiling 300 (2832k) ERODING dom1.73× · floor 260 (1175k) ERODING dom1.13×
⚑ also abnormal flow 285PE bought ₹44.8L (-3.9% OTM, +7.0v)  ·  275PE bought ₹30.2L (-0.3% OTM, +5.3v)
what has been moving
  • the floor has slid down 14.6% over 3 days in a row, while the stock moved -4.5% over that stretch
  • the shorts are up 6.2% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • put-vs-call skew has risen (-5.5 → -2.1 over 2 days) — fear building into puts (context only, not a vote)
  • meanwhile the stock is -6.9% over the last 10 trading days
PATANJALIBUYER · bullishspot 365IV 37implied ±6.2%CE buyer @ 400 · 1.64×impl · excess-IV +5.6v · ₹33.0LLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +5.6v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.64× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹33.0L, 34% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 400 · excess-IV +5.6v (intensity) · ₹33.0L / 741,750 OI-add = 34% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -1.0v · ceiling 400 (2194k) dom1.38× · floor 400 (749k) ERODING dom1.24×
⚑ also abnormal flow 400CE bought ₹37.4L (+9.2% OTM, +1.2v)  ·  390CE bought ₹25.7L (+6.2% OTM, +1.2v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has climbed 13.8% over 11 days in a row, while the stock moved +8.2% over that stretch
  • the floor has climbed 22.0% over 8 days in a row, while the stock itself barely moved (+0.1%) — the floor is moving on its own
  • the longs are down 8.0% on their average buy price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 17.4% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
  • put-vs-call skew has eased (+1.8 → -1.0 over 2 days) — fear coming out of puts (context only, not a vote)
  • short positions jumped 5.4% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling
SUZLONBUYER · bullishspot 40IV 37implied ±6.2%CE buyer @ 44 · 1.84×impl · excess-IV +3.6v · ₹32.6LLARGE
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 5d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.6v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.84× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹32.6L, 58% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 44 · excess-IV +3.6v (intensity) · ₹32.6L / 8,585,200 OI-add = 58% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +2.0v · ceiling 45 (26187k) ERODING dom1.31× · floor 40 (15342k) BUILDING dom2.23×
⚑ also abnormal flow 40PE bought ₹59.7L (-1.6% OTM, +4.6v)
MAHABANKBUYER · bullishspot 80IV 36implied ±6.1%CE buyer @ 85 · 1.16×impl · excess-IV +6.7v · ₹10.3LOK
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +6.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.16× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹10.3L, 20% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 85 · excess-IV +6.7v (intensity) · ₹10.3L / 767,000 OI-add = 20% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -0.8v · ceiling 85 (3894k) dom1.64× · floor 80 (2230k) RELOCATING dom1.78×
⚑ also abnormal flow 80CE bought ₹21.1L (-0.6% OTM, +2.9v)  ·  85CE bought ₹10.6L (+7.1% OTM, +2.0v)
BANDHANBNKBUYER · bullishspot 179IV 36implied ±6.0%CE buyer @ 190 · 1.10×impl · excess-IV +5.9v · ₹56.0LLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +5.9v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.10× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹56.0L, 15% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 190 · excess-IV +5.9v (intensity) · ₹56.0L / 1,713,600 OI-add = 15% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -0.9v · ceiling 190 (11423k) dom1.51× · floor 190 (5252k) ERODING dom1.24×
⚑ also abnormal flow 180CE bought ₹71.5L (+1.0% OTM, +1.5v)  ·  185CE bought ₹55.4L (+3.1% OTM, +1.1v)
PREMIERENEBUYER · bearishspot 879IV 34implied ±5.6%PE buyer @ 820 · 1.03×impl · excess-IV +8.8v · ₹11.7LMEDIUM
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +8.8v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.03× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹11.7L, 59% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 820 · excess-IV +8.8v (intensity) · ₹11.7L / 105,950 OI-add = 59% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -4.1v · ceiling 900 (2046k) dom1.94× · floor 900 (781k) ERODING dom1.38×
⚑ also abnormal flow 900CE bought ₹51.7L (+3.4% OTM, +7.7v)  ·  1000CE bought ₹6.3L (+14.2% OTM, +2.0v)
what has been moving
  • the floor has slid down 4.6% over 24 days in a row, while the stock moved -11.9% over that stretch
  • open futures positions grew 35.0% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts piling in
  • short positions jumped 13.7% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
CGPOWERBUYER · bullishspot 861IV 32implied ±5.4%CE buyer @ 900 · 0.99×impl · excess-IV +1.6v · ₹26.2LMEDIUM

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +1.6v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.99× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹26.2L, 28% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 900 · excess-IV +1.6v (intensity) · ₹26.2L / 187,850 OI-add = 28% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -3.8v · ceiling 900 (668k) ERODING dom2.12× · floor 900 (399k) dom1.64×
⚑ also abnormal flow 840PE bought ₹7.7L (+2.9% OTM, +11.2v)
FORCEMOTBUYER · bullishspot 17128IV 33implied ±5.4%CE buyer @ 18500 · 1.57×impl · excess-IV +2.4v · ₹5.2LOK

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.4v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.57× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹5.2L, 34% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 18500 · excess-IV +2.4v (intensity) · ₹5.2L / 2,675 OI-add = 34% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +2.5v · ceiling 17500 (18k) dom1.04× · floor 17000 (16k) RELOCATING dom1.06×
⚑ also abnormal flow 17000PE bought ₹19.4L (+0.7% OTM, +5.3v)  ·  17500PE bought ₹15.9L (-2.2% OTM, +7.0v)
GODREJPROPBUYER · bullishspot 1643IV 32implied ±5.4%CE buyer @ 1800 · 1.95×impl · excess-IV +1.6v · ₹20.6LMEDIUM

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +1.6v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.95× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹20.6L, 31% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 1800 · excess-IV +1.6v (intensity) · ₹20.6L / 174,525 OI-add = 31% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -1.1v · ceiling 1800 (570k) dom1.52× · floor 1700 (326k) ERODING dom1.73×
POWERINDIABUYER · bullishspot 30630IV 32implied ±5.3%CE buyer @ 33000 · 1.46×impl · excess-IV +5.8v · ₹13.1LMEDIUM
↷ changed from SQUEEZE-VULNERABLE (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +5.8v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.46× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹13.1L, 16% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 33000 · excess-IV +5.8v (intensity) · ₹13.1L / 4,150 OI-add = 16% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +3.0v · ceiling 32000 (33k) dom1.24× · floor 31000 (34k) dom1.03×
⚑ also abnormal flow 30500CE bought ₹58.4L (-0.4% OTM, +3.6v)  ·  32000CE bought ₹28.5L (+4.5% OTM, +5.5v)
SAGILITYBUYER · bullishspot 43IV 32implied ±5.3%CE buyer @ 47 · 1.95×impl · excess-IV +8.1v · ₹4.3LOK
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 4d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +8.1v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.95× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹4.3L, 60% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 47 · excess-IV +8.1v (intensity) · ₹4.3L / 1,188,000 OI-add = 60% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -5.5v · ceiling 45 (4332k) dom1.22× · floor 43 (2280k) dom1.53×
⚑ also abnormal flow 42CE bought ₹23.3L (-2.0% OTM, +1.3v)  ·  43CE bought ₹10.6L (+0.3% OTM, +1.2v)
JSWENERGYBUYER · bullishspot 492IV 31implied ±5.2%CE buyer @ 520 · 0.99×impl · excess-IV +2.7v · ₹4.8LOK

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.99× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹4.8L, 22% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 520 · excess-IV +2.7v (intensity) · ₹4.8L / 86,000 OI-add = 22% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +6.1v · ceiling 500 (640k) RELOCATING dom1.23× · floor 600 (646k) ERODING dom1.01×
⚑ also abnormal flow 500PE bought ₹29.4L (-1.1% OTM, +3.9v)  ·  500CE bought ₹12.9L (+0.8% OTM, +1.1v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling had been climbing for 2 days, then turned down 12.1% today, while the stock itself barely moved (-0.7%) — the ceiling is moving on its own
  • the floor has climbed 12.1% over 3 days in a row, while the stock moved -3.0% over that stretch
  • the longs are down 5.0% on their average buy price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 5.3% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
MAXHEALTHBUYER · bearishspot 920IV 31implied ±5.2%PE buyer @ 880 · 1.03×impl · excess-IV +3.0v · ₹32.3LLARGE
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.0v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.03× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹32.3L, 99% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 880 · excess-IV +3.0v (intensity) · ₹32.3L / 196,350 OI-add = 99% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +15.4v · ceiling 1000 (736k) RELOCATING dom1.04× · floor 900 (808k) RELOCATING dom2.34×
⚑ also abnormal flow 950PE bought ₹1.04cr (-2.7% OTM, +8.6v)  ·  1000CE bought ₹24.9L (+9.8% OTM, +1.0v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling had been climbing for 9 days, then turned down 2.2% today, while the stock moved -11.3% over that stretch
  • the floor had been climbing for 10 days, then turned down 10.8% today, while the stock moved -10.2% over that stretch
  • the shorts just flipped to winning — now up 11.3% on their average sell price (was down 6.2%), first time in 1 day
  • meanwhile the stock is -11.3% over the last 10 trading days
  • short positions jumped 12.7% in one day (2026-09-30) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling
NBCCBUYER · bullishspot 79IV 31implied ±5.2%CE buyer @ 85 · 1.59×impl · excess-IV +4.3v · ₹12.5LMEDIUM

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +4.3v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.59× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹12.5L, 32% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 85 · excess-IV +4.3v (intensity) · ₹12.5L / 1,683,500 OI-add = 32% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -1.1v · ceiling 85 (5252k) dom1.51× · floor 80 (2438k) BUILDING dom1.98×
⚑ also abnormal flow 80PE bought ₹16.0L (-0.8% OTM, +8.8v)  ·  77.5PE bought ₹6.7L (+2.6% OTM, +7.6v)
what has been moving
  • the floor has slid down 6.4% over 11 days in a row, while the stock moved -1.7% over that stretch
  • the shorts are up 4.2% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • short positions jumped 1.4% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
CROMPTONBUYER · bullishspot 210IV 31implied ±5.1%vol / strangle @ 230 · 2.00×impl · excess-IV +8.9v · ₹9.1LOKVOL two-sided
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 6d ago)

Vol / two-sided bet. Comparable reach buyers on BOTH sides — someone paying up (excess-IV +8.9v) for a big move EITHER way, ~2.00× the implied weekly move out. A straddle/strangle vol bet, not directional — no LONG/SHORT read. This is a OK position (₹9.1L, 30% of the strike's OI) — Excluded from directional expectancy; surfaced because the size expects a move.

CE buyer @ 230 · excess-IV +8.9v (intensity) · ₹9.1L / 651,450 OI-add = 30% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -5.3v · ceiling 230 (2165k) dom1.1× · floor 220 (1382k) dom1.07×
⚑ also abnormal flow 210PE bought ₹26.2L (-0.6% OTM, +5.3v)  ·  205PE bought ₹9.3L (+1.8% OTM, +3.2v)
IRFCBUYER · bearishspot 78IV 30implied ±5.1%PE buyer @ 75 · 1.06×impl · excess-IV +4.2v · ₹13.9LMEDIUM

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +4.2v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.06× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹13.9L, 16% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 75 · excess-IV +4.2v (intensity) · ₹13.9L / 1,085,000 OI-add = 16% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +11.9v · ceiling 80 (10085k) RELOCATING dom1.01× · floor 75 (6749k) RELOCATING dom1.03×
⚑ also abnormal flow 80CE bought ₹74.0L (-1.1% OTM, +4.2v)  ·  81CE bought ₹67.6L (+0.1% OTM, +3.8v)
OBEROIRLTYBUYER · bearishspot 1781IV 30implied ±5.1%PE buyer @ 1620 · 1.62×impl · excess-IV +6.3v · ₹1.3LOK
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +6.3v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.62× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹1.3L, 100% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 1620 · excess-IV +6.3v (intensity) · ₹1.3L / 12,600 OI-add = 100% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -3.4v · ceiling 1900 (159k) dom1.68× · floor 1800 (85k) dom1.39×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1640PE bought ₹3.8L (+8.2% OTM, +3.5v)  ·  1680PE bought ₹3.4L (+5.9% OTM, +3.5v)
what has been moving
  • the floor had been sliding down for 15 days, then turned up 5.7% today, while the stock moved -3.4% over that stretch
  • open futures positions grew 7.2% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts piling in
  • put-vs-call skew has eased (+0.7 → -3.4 over 2 days) — fear coming out of puts (context only, not a vote)
  • short positions jumped 9.1% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
TECHMBUYER · bullishspot 1531IV 31implied ±5.1%CE buyer @ 1600 · 0.98×impl · excess-IV +3.4v · ₹59.2LLARGE
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 5d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.4v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.98× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹59.2L, 33% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 1600 · excess-IV +3.4v (intensity) · ₹59.2L / 243,600 OI-add = 33% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +1.3v · ceiling 1540 (1831k) RELOCATING dom2.46× · floor 1540 (419k) dom1.1×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1520PE bought ₹59.9L (+0.5% OTM, +5.5v)  ·  1540PE bought ₹49.9L (-0.8% OTM, +5.7v)
GVT&DBUYER · bullishspot 4242IV 30implied ±5.0%CE buyer @ 4400 · 0.95×impl · excess-IV +3.2v · ₹31.7LLARGE
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 5d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.2v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.95× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹31.7L, 42% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 4400 · excess-IV +3.2v (intensity) · ₹31.7L / 42,250 OI-add = 42% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -6.3v · ceiling 4600 (162k) ERODING dom1.1× · floor 4000 (329k) dom2.51×
⚑ also abnormal flow 4300PE bought ₹52.8L (-2.0% OTM, +2.8v)  ·  4200PE bought ₹39.3L (+0.9% OTM, +2.1v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling had been climbing for 19 days, then turned down 4.8% today, while the stock itself barely moved (-0.2%) — the ceiling is moving on its own
  • the floor has slid down 14.3% over 2 days in a row, while the stock moved +1.5% over that stretch
  • the shorts are up 4.0% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 1.1% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts piling in
  • put-vs-call skew has eased (+6.8 → -6.3 over 2 days) — fear coming out of puts (context only, not a vote)
PRESTIGECOVER · WRITER-COVER · bearishspot 1482IV 30implied ±5.0%PE cover @ 1460 · 0.30×impl · excess-IV +5.5v · ₹36.5LOK

Informed unwind (COVER). PE writers are buying back — excess-IV +5.5v (IV rose vs surface as they paid up to close), so the floor is being pulled. Reads bearish — a wall coming off in the crowd's face (capitulation). A OK unwind (₹36.5L, 60% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

PE cover @ 1460 · WRITER-COVER — writers buying back (cap lifting / floor pulled) · bearish · excess-IV +5.5v · ₹36.5L / 90,000 OI-shed = 60% of strike OI
chain now skew +5.5v · ceiling 1500 (360k) ERODING dom1.54× · floor 1420 (237k) RELOCATING dom1.01×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1480PE bought ₹94.6L (+0.4% OTM, +1.2v)  ·  1440PE bought ₹15.3L (+2.0% OTM, +1.1v)
MUTHOOTFINBUYER · bullishspot 2759IV 29implied ±4.9%CE buyer @ 3000 · 1.96×impl · excess-IV +2.0v · ₹8.7LOK

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.0v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.96× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹8.7L, 19% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 3000 · excess-IV +2.0v (intensity) · ₹8.7L / 58,300 OI-add = 19% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -3.1v · ceiling 2900 (456k) ERODING dom1.09× · floor 2600 (273k) dom1.12×
YESBANKBUYER · bullishspot 21IV 30implied ±4.9%CE buyer @ 23 · 2.00×impl · excess-IV +5.7v · ₹20.1LMEDIUM
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 5d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +5.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 2.00× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹20.1L, 16% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 23 · excess-IV +5.7v (intensity) · ₹20.1L / 11,849,100 OI-add = 16% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -3.1v · ceiling 23 (73831k) dom1.22× · floor 22 (64719k) ERODING dom1.38×
APLAPOLLOBUYER · bearishspot 2204IV 29implied ±4.8%PE buyer @ 2100 · 0.86×impl · excess-IV +3.3v · ₹8.6LOK

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.3v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 0.86× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹8.6L, 13% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 2100 · excess-IV +3.3v (intensity) · ₹8.6L / 29,750 OI-add = 13% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -0.5v · ceiling 2200 (470k) dom3.49× · floor 2200 (415k) RELOCATING dom1.84×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2220PE bought ₹93.4L (-1.8% OTM, +3.0v)  ·  2200PE bought ₹79.9L (-0.2% OTM, +6.5v)
what has been moving
  • open futures positions grew 10.0% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
  • short positions jumped 4.5% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
IDFCFIRSTBBUYER · bullishspot 82IV 28implied ±4.7%CE buyer @ 87 · 1.45×impl · excess-IV +4.7v · ₹53.5LLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +4.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.45× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹53.5L, 70% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 87 · excess-IV +4.7v (intensity) · ₹53.5L / 6,946,975 OI-add = 70% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +1.8v · ceiling 90 (20229k) ERODING dom1.26× · floor 80 (14645k) RELOCATING dom1.33×
⚑ also abnormal flow 79PE bought ₹1.20cr (+3.2% OTM, +12.0v)  ·  82PE writer-cover ₹70.8L (-0.4% OTM, +10.7v)
what has been moving
  • the longs are down 7.2% on their average buy price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 1.7% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
  • meanwhile the stock is -5.5% over the last 10 trading days
  • short positions jumped 2.4% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
JIOFINBUYER · bullishspot 217IV 28implied ±4.7%CE buyer @ 230 · 1.29×impl · excess-IV +4.1v · ₹85.2LLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +4.1v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.29× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹85.2L, 26% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 230 · excess-IV +4.1v (intensity) · ₹85.2L / 3,522,650 OI-add = 26% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +4.2v · ceiling 230 (13966k) RELOCATING dom1.17× · floor 220 (9304k) BUILDING dom1.28×
⚑ also abnormal flow 222.5PE bought ₹1.98cr (-3.0% OTM, +6.7v)  ·  215PE bought ₹1.38cr (+0.4% OTM, +3.5v)
NYKAABUYER · bullishspot 322IV 28implied ±4.7%CE buyer @ 350 · 1.99×impl · excess-IV +2.2v · ₹3.4LOK

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.2v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.99× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹3.4L, 12% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 350 · excess-IV +2.2v (intensity) · ₹3.4L / 165,625 OI-add = 12% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -0.8v · ceiling 350 (1403k) ERODING dom2.19× · floor 300 (712k) ERODING dom1.01×
⚑ also abnormal flow 325PE bought ₹18.1L (-1.0% OTM, +3.9v)  ·  330PE bought ₹11.7L (-2.0% OTM, +5.4v)
ABBCOVER · WRITER-COVER · bearishspot 6832IV 28implied ±4.7%PE cover @ 7100 · -1.02×impl · excess-IV +8.1v · ₹2.00crLARGE

Informed unwind (COVER). PE writers are buying back — excess-IV +8.1v (IV rose vs surface as they paid up to close), so the floor is being pulled. Reads bearish — a wall coming off in the crowd's face (capitulation). A LARGE unwind (₹2.00cr, 135% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

PE cover @ 7100 · WRITER-COVER — writers buying back (cap lifting / floor pulled) · bearish · excess-IV +8.1v · ₹2.00cr / 54,625 OI-shed = 135% of strike OI
chain now skew -2.9v · ceiling 7000 (146k) RELOCATING dom1.18× · floor 6700 (100k) RELOCATING dom1.08×
⚑ also abnormal flow 6700PE bought ₹1.05cr (+1.2% OTM, +15.6v)  ·  6900PE writer-cover ₹60.1L (-0.7% OTM, +22.7v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 7.4% over 15 days in a row, but the stock moved about the same (-7.8%) — the ceiling is just tracking price
  • the floor has slid down 10.3% over 10 days in a row, while the stock moved -2.7% over that stretch
  • the shorts are up 5.7% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • meanwhile the stock is -4.2% over the last 10 trading days
  • short positions jumped 3.7% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
IDFCFIRSTBCOVER · WRITER-COVER · bearishspot 82IV 28implied ±4.7%PE cover @ 85 · -0.93×impl · excess-IV +3.8v · ₹2.07crLARGE

Informed unwind (COVER). PE writers are buying back — excess-IV +3.8v (IV rose vs surface as they paid up to close), so the floor is being pulled. Reads bearish — a wall coming off in the crowd's face (capitulation). A LARGE unwind (₹2.07cr, 58% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

PE cover @ 85 · WRITER-COVER — writers buying back (cap lifting / floor pulled) · bearish · excess-IV +3.8v · ₹2.07cr / 4,600,400 OI-shed = 58% of strike OI
chain now skew +1.8v · ceiling 90 (20229k) ERODING dom1.26× · floor 80 (14645k) RELOCATING dom1.33×
⚑ also abnormal flow 79PE bought ₹1.20cr (+3.2% OTM, +12.0v)  ·  82PE writer-cover ₹70.8L (-0.4% OTM, +10.7v)
what has been moving
  • the longs are down 7.2% on their average buy price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 1.7% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
  • meanwhile the stock is -5.5% over the last 10 trading days
  • short positions jumped 2.4% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
HYUNDAIBUYER · bullishspot 2028IV 28implied ±4.6%CE buyer @ 2200 · 1.81×impl · excess-IV +8.7v · ₹3.2LOK

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +8.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.81× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹3.2L, 16% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 2200 · excess-IV +8.7v (intensity) · ₹3.2L / 25,300 OI-add = 16% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +4.2v · ceiling 2100 (207k) RELOCATING dom1.31× · floor 2100 (123k) dom1.01×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2100CE bought ₹29.7L (+2.6% OTM, +3.2v)
SUPREMEINDBUYER · bullishspot 3466IV 28implied ±4.6%vol / strangle @ 3700 · 1.57×impl · excess-IV +9.3v · ₹1.6LOKVOL two-sided

Vol / two-sided bet. Comparable reach buyers on BOTH sides — someone paying up (excess-IV +9.3v) for a big move EITHER way, ~1.57× the implied weekly move out. A straddle/strangle vol bet, not directional — no LONG/SHORT read. This is a OK position (₹1.6L, 71% of the strike's OI) — Excluded from directional expectancy; surfaced because the size expects a move.

CE buyer @ 3700 · excess-IV +9.3v (intensity) · ₹1.6L / 5,075 OI-add = 71% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -0.2v · ceiling 3500 (46k) RELOCATING dom1.08× · floor 3600 (26k) dom1.71×
⚑ also abnormal flow 3500PE bought ₹3.4L (-0.2% OTM, +9.2v)  ·  3300PE bought ₹1.6L (+4.4% OTM, +5.0v)
ZYDUSLIFECOVER · WRITER-COVER · bearishspot 1165IV 27implied ±4.6%PE cover @ 1200 · -0.71×impl · excess-IV +4.9v · ₹89.1LMEDIUM

Informed unwind (COVER). PE writers are buying back — excess-IV +4.9v (IV rose vs surface as they paid up to close), so the floor is being pulled. Reads bearish — a wall coming off in the crowd's face (capitulation). A MEDIUM unwind (₹89.1L, 48% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

PE cover @ 1200 · WRITER-COVER — writers buying back (cap lifting / floor pulled) · bearish · excess-IV +4.9v · ₹89.1L / 162,000 OI-shed = 48% of strike OI
chain now skew +1.5v · ceiling 1200 (670k) dom1.02× · floor 1200 (337k) ERODING dom1.43×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1200PE writer-cover ₹85.6L (-3.3% OTM, +3.8v)  ·  1180PE bought ₹59.4L (-2.0% OTM, +1.2v)
MFSLBUYER · bearishspot 1374IV 27implied ±4.5%PE buyer @ 1260 · 1.83×impl · excess-IV +1.8v · ₹3.1LOK

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +1.8v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.83× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹3.1L, 91% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 1260 · excess-IV +1.8v (intensity) · ₹3.1L / 31,200 OI-add = 91% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +4.3v · ceiling 1500 (209k) ERODING dom1.16× · floor 1400 (201k) ERODING dom1.76×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1400PE writer-cover ₹23.8L (-3.9% OTM, +2.5v)  ·  1360PE bought ₹23.5L (-0.6% OTM, +1.2v)
HEROMOTOCOBUYER · bullishspot 5280IV 27implied ±4.4%CE buyer @ 5500 · 1.12×impl · excess-IV +4.7v · ₹29.6LLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +4.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.12× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹29.6L, 22% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 5500 · excess-IV +4.7v (intensity) · ₹29.6L / 46,500 OI-add = 22% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -1.9v · ceiling 5400 (255k) dom1.18× · floor 5300 (158k) dom1.89×
⚑ also abnormal flow 5300PE bought ₹45.3L (+0.5% OTM, +4.2v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 5.7% over 8 days in a row, while the stock itself barely moved (-0.9%) — the ceiling is moving on its own
  • the shorts are up 2.2% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
LICHSGFINBUYER · bullishspot 537IV 26implied ±4.4%CE buyer @ 560 · 1.28×impl · excess-IV +3.7v · ₹1.20crLARGE
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 3d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.28× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹1.20cr, 91% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 560 · excess-IV +3.7v (intensity) · ₹1.20cr / 1,938,000 OI-add = 91% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -2.1v · ceiling 560 (2123k) BUILDING dom4.15× · floor 540 (629k) RELOCATING dom1.76×
⚑ also abnormal flow 600CE bought ₹5.9L (+7.8% OTM, +1.1v)
MANKINDBUYER · bearishspot 2502IV 27implied ±4.4%PE buyer @ 2300 · 1.85×impl · excess-IV +7.0v · ₹13.3LMEDIUM
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +7.0v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.85× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹13.3L, 79% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 2300 · excess-IV +7.0v (intensity) · ₹13.3L / 92,750 OI-add = 79% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +3.4v · ceiling 2500 (152k) dom1.43× · floor 2300 (117k) RELOCATING dom1.19×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2460CE bought ₹59.3L (-2.1% OTM, +1.8v)  ·  2460PE bought ₹42.0L (+2.4% OTM, +2.7v)
what has been moving
  • open futures positions shrank 2.9% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs closing out
  • the number of open futures positions is near the top of its 25-day range (bigger than 46% of the last 25 days)
  • meanwhile the stock is +8.3% over the last 10 trading days
  • long positions jumped 4.6% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price rose that day it was fresh buying, and the price has turned against them since
MOTHERSONBUYER · bullishspot 164IV 26implied ±4.4%CE buyer @ 175 · 1.63×impl · excess-IV +3.3v · ₹24.1LMEDIUM
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.3v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.63× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹24.1L, 46% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 175 · excess-IV +3.3v (intensity) · ₹24.1L / 2,232,450 OI-add = 46% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +4.0v · ceiling 170 (6408k) ERODING dom1.32× · floor 155 (3598k) dom1.19×
⚑ also abnormal flow 162.5PE bought ₹18.3L (+0.5% OTM, +15.1v)  ·  160PE bought ₹14.3L (+1.6% OTM, +11.0v)
what has been moving
  • the shorts are down 1.7% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 10.2% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts piling in
  • short positions jumped 10.5% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
SHREECEMBUYER · bearishspot 22140IV 26implied ±4.4%PE buyer @ 20500 · 1.88×impl · excess-IV +6.5v · ₹1.0LOK
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +6.5v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.88× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹1.0L, 41% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 20500 · excess-IV +6.5v (intensity) · ₹1.0L / 975 OI-add = 41% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +6.1v · ceiling 23000 (20k) BUILDING dom3.49× · floor 21000 (9k) RELOCATING dom2.01×
⚑ also abnormal flow 21000PE bought ₹12.1L (+4.8% OTM, +1.6v)
DELHIVERYCOVER · WRITER-COVER · bearishspot 409IV 27implied ±4.4%PE cover @ 420 · -0.57×impl · excess-IV +4.7v · ₹54.2LMEDIUM

Informed unwind (COVER). PE writers are buying back — excess-IV +4.7v (IV rose vs surface as they paid up to close), so the floor is being pulled. Reads bearish — a wall coming off in the crowd's face (capitulation). A MEDIUM unwind (₹54.2L, 65% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

PE cover @ 420 · WRITER-COVER — writers buying back (cap lifting / floor pulled) · bearish · excess-IV +4.7v · ₹54.2L / 298,800 OI-shed = 65% of strike OI
chain now skew +6.9v · ceiling 430 (2677k) ERODING dom2.03× · floor 390 (1697k) dom1.37×
⚑ also abnormal flow 420PE writer-cover ₹55.2L (-2.5% OTM, +6.0v)
MANKINDCOVER · WRITER-COVER · bullishspot 2502IV 27implied ±4.4%CE cover @ 2600 · 0.87×impl · excess-IV +2.9v · ₹21.8LOK
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed unwind (COVER). CE writers are buying back — excess-IV +2.9v (IV rose vs surface as they paid up to close), so the ceiling is lifting. Reads bullish — a wall coming off in the crowd's face (capitulation). A OK unwind (₹21.8L, 58% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

CE cover @ 2600 · WRITER-COVER — writers buying back (cap lifting / floor pulled) · bullish · excess-IV +2.9v · ₹21.8L / 61,750 OI-shed = 58% of strike OI
chain now skew +3.4v · ceiling 2500 (152k) dom1.43× · floor 2300 (117k) RELOCATING dom1.19×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2460CE bought ₹59.3L (-2.1% OTM, +1.8v)  ·  2460PE bought ₹42.0L (+2.4% OTM, +2.7v)
what has been moving
  • open futures positions shrank 2.9% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs closing out
  • the number of open futures positions is near the top of its 25-day range (bigger than 46% of the last 25 days)
  • meanwhile the stock is +8.3% over the last 10 trading days
  • long positions jumped 4.6% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price rose that day it was fresh buying, and the price has turned against them since
AUROPHARMABUYER · bearishspot 1677IV 26implied ±4.3%PE buyer @ 1600 · 1.00×impl · excess-IV +2.0v · ₹30.9LLARGE
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-LONG (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.0v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.00× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹30.9L, 57% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 1600 · excess-IV +2.0v (intensity) · ₹30.9L / 177,100 OI-add = 57% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +1.0v · ceiling 1800 (1138k) ERODING dom1.4× · floor 1700 (580k) dom1.78×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1660PE bought ₹69.8L (+0.9% OTM, +2.5v)  ·  1700PE bought ₹61.7L (-1.5% OTM, +7.0v)
what has been moving
  • the longs just flipped to losing — now down 1.5% on their average buy price (was up 0.3%), first time in 5 days
  • long positions jumped 6.7% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price rose that day it was fresh buying, and the price has turned against them since
CAMSBUYER · bullishspot 677IV 26implied ±4.3%CE buyer @ 700 · 1.00×impl · excess-IV +2.2v · ₹7.4LOK
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.2v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.00× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹7.4L, 23% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 700 · excess-IV +2.2v (intensity) · ₹7.4L / 78,375 OI-add = 23% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -2.1v · ceiling 800 (508k) ERODING dom1.46× · floor 700 (270k) dom1.29×
⚑ also abnormal flow 680PE bought ₹14.5L (-1.9% OTM, +3.2v)  ·  670PE bought ₹8.4L (+0.1% OTM, +2.8v)
what has been moving
  • the shorts just flipped to losing — now down 0.6% on their average sell price (was up 0.4%), first time in 1 day
  • open futures positions grew 28.4% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts piling in
  • meanwhile the stock is -5.2% over the last 10 trading days
  • short positions jumped 18.6% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
POLYCABBUYER · bullishspot 8094IV 26implied ±4.3%CE buyer @ 8300 · 0.79×impl · excess-IV +3.5v · ₹33.1LLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.5v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.79× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹33.1L, 27% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 8300 · excess-IV +3.5v (intensity) · ₹33.1L / 23,750 OI-add = 27% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -4.0v · ceiling 8200 (164k) dom1.79× · floor 7800 (192k) dom1.28×
⚑ also abnormal flow 8200PE bought ₹64.9L (-1.4% OTM, +1.1v)  ·  8100PE bought ₹47.6L (-0.2% OTM, +1.8v)
AMBUJACEMBUYER · bullishspot 375IV 25implied ±4.2%CE buyer @ 400 · 1.66×impl · excess-IV +4.7v · ₹11.7LMEDIUM

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +4.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.66× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹11.7L, 21% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 400 · excess-IV +4.7v (intensity) · ₹11.7L / 416,400 OI-add = 21% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +3.5v · ceiling 400 (2023k) dom1.91× · floor 480 (1259k) dom2.05×
APOLLOHOSPBUYER · bullishspot 8128IV 25implied ±4.2%CE buyer @ 8500 · 0.98×impl · excess-IV +8.6v · ₹2.03crLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +8.6v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.98× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹2.03cr, 98% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 8500 · excess-IV +8.6v (intensity) · ₹2.03cr / 245,000 OI-add = 98% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +9.2v · ceiling 9000 (425k) BUILDING dom1.7× · floor 8000 (212k) RELOCATING dom1.63×
⚑ also abnormal flow 8400PE bought ₹1.71cr (-3.3% OTM, +1.2v)  ·  9000CE bought ₹57.4L (+11.2% OTM, +1.1v)
BIOCONBUYER · bullishspot 374IV 25implied ±4.2%CE buyer @ 400 · 1.91×impl · excess-IV +6.6v · ₹23.3LMEDIUM

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +6.6v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.91× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹23.3L, 22% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 400 · excess-IV +6.6v (intensity) · ₹23.3L / 1,015,000 OI-add = 22% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -0.9v · ceiling 400 (4542k) ERODING dom1.68× · floor 360 (3658k) BUILDING dom2.81×
⚑ also abnormal flow 360PE bought ₹41.0L (+3.8% OTM, +2.5v)  ·  365PE bought ₹36.6L (+2.4% OTM, +3.4v)
GODREJCPBUYER · bearishspot 852IV 25implied ±4.1%PE buyer @ 800 · 1.43×impl · excess-IV +3.6v · ₹8.6LOK

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.6v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.43× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹8.6L, 64% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 800 · excess-IV +3.6v (intensity) · ₹8.6L / 144,500 OI-add = 64% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +2.9v · ceiling 900 (490k) dom1.53× · floor 940 (377k) ERODING dom1.28×
PFCBUYER · bullishspot 329IV 24implied ±4.1%CE buyer @ 340 · 1.09×impl · excess-IV +3.2v · ₹23.8LMEDIUM
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 6d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.2v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.09× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹23.8L, 24% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 340 · excess-IV +3.2v (intensity) · ₹23.8L / 573,300 OI-add = 24% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -3.2v · ceiling 350 (4025k) ERODING dom1.7× · floor 340 (2112k) dom1.04×
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 15.4% over 11 days in a row, while the stock moved -5.0% over that stretch
  • the shorts are up 5.0% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 3.6% over the last 10 trading days — mostly shorts piling in
  • short positions jumped 2.7% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
GMRAIRPORTBUYER · bearishspot 95IV 24implied ±4.0%vol / strangle @ 92 · 0.83×impl · excess-IV +2.0v · ₹19.3LMEDIUMVOL two-sided

Vol / two-sided bet. Comparable reach buyers on BOTH sides — someone paying up (excess-IV +2.0v) for a big move EITHER way, ~0.83× the implied weekly move out. A straddle/strangle vol bet, not directional — no LONG/SHORT read. This is a MEDIUM position (₹19.3L, 41% of the strike's OI) — Excluded from directional expectancy; surfaced because the size expects a move.

PE buyer @ 92 · excess-IV +2.0v (intensity) · ₹19.3L / 1,660,050 OI-add = 41% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +1.9v · ceiling 100 (8747k) ERODING dom1.16× · floor 93 (7924k) dom1.05×
⚑ also abnormal flow 92PE bought ₹19.3L (+3.3% OTM, +1.7v)
HINDALCOCOVER · HOLDER-COVER · bullishspot 950IV 24implied ±4.0%PE cover @ 1000 · -1.54×impl · excess-IV -6.0v · ₹2.52crLARGE

Informed unwind (COVER). PE holders are taking profit — excess-IV -6.0v (IV fell as longs sold to close), the bears are leaving. Reads bullish. A LARGE unwind (₹2.52cr, 47% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

PE cover @ 1000 · HOLDER-COVER — holders taking profit (bulls/bears leaving) · bullish · excess-IV -6.0v · ₹2.52cr / 450,100 OI-shed = 47% of strike OI
chain now skew +0.0v · ceiling 960 (1269k) dom1.06× · floor 960 (1759k) ERODING dom1.36×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1000PE writer-cover ₹2.33cr (-5.2% OTM, +4.9v)  ·  980PE bought ₹1.98cr (-3.1% OTM, +2.8v)
BAJAJFINSVBUYER · bullishspot 1734IV 24implied ±3.9%CE buyer @ 1860 · 1.91×impl · excess-IV +8.7v · ₹6.5LOK
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +8.7v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.91× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹6.5L, 48% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 1860 · excess-IV +8.7v (intensity) · ₹6.5L / 89,100 OI-add = 48% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +5.0v · ceiling 1840 (433k) dom1.11× · floor 1700 (535k) dom3.22×
PAGEINDBUYER · bullishspot 36690IV 24implied ±3.9%CE buyer @ 37500 · 0.79×impl · excess-IV +6.5v · ₹11.7LMEDIUM
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-LONG (that tag first given 5d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +6.5v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.79× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹11.7L, 77% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 37500 · excess-IV +6.5v (intensity) · ₹11.7L / 1,780 OI-add = 77% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -1.6v · ceiling 40000 (7k) ERODING dom1.4× · floor 37000 (4k) dom1.02×
⚑ also abnormal flow 37000PE bought ₹21.9L (-1.9% OTM, +2.8v)  ·  35000PE bought ₹14.5L (+3.6% OTM, +1.9v)
INDHOTELBUYER · bullishspot 734IV 22implied ±3.7%CE buyer @ 750 · 0.79×impl · excess-IV +1.9v · ₹18.9LMEDIUM
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-LONG (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +1.9v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.79× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹18.9L, 25% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 750 · excess-IV +1.9v (intensity) · ₹18.9L / 178,000 OI-add = 25% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -0.8v · ceiling 750 (699k) ERODING dom1.11× · floor 720 (542k) dom1.02×
what has been moving
  • the floor has climbed 5.5% over 5 days in a row, while the stock moved -1.2% over that stretch
  • the longs just flipped to winning — now up 1.9% on their average buy price (was down 0.4%), first time in 2 days
  • open futures positions grew 8.3% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
  • long positions jumped 5.5% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price rose that day it was fresh buying
KOTAKBANKBUYER · bearishspot 417IV 22implied ±3.6%PE buyer @ 390 · 1.80×impl · excess-IV +3.8v · ₹85.6LLARGE
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A PE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.8v = intensity) for downside, at a strike 1.80× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹85.6L, 83% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

PE buyer @ 390 · excess-IV +3.8v (intensity) · ₹85.6L / 3,566,000 OI-add = 83% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +6.7v · ceiling 410 (12358k) RELOCATING dom2.56× · floor 390 (4608k) RELOCATING dom1.53×
⚑ also abnormal flow 420PE bought ₹1.31cr (-1.2% OTM, +5.6v)  ·  390PE bought ₹1.02cr (+5.5% OTM, +3.4v)
LUPINBUYER · bullishspot 2047IV 22implied ±3.6%CE buyer @ 2140 · 1.50×impl · excess-IV +3.5v · ₹33.3LLARGE

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +3.5v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.50× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹33.3L, 84% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 2140 · excess-IV +3.5v (intensity) · ₹33.3L / 209,525 OI-add = 84% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -1.0v · ceiling 2100 (693k) dom2.76× · floor 2100 (435k) ERODING dom1.38×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2080PE bought ₹1.06cr (-2.5% OTM, +6.6v)  ·  2020PE bought ₹63.0L (+1.3% OTM, +6.0v)
MARICOBUYER · bullishspot 794IV 22implied ±3.6%CE buyer @ 820 · 1.20×impl · excess-IV +9.5v · ₹20.3LMEDIUM

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +9.5v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.20× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹20.3L, 42% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 820 · excess-IV +9.5v (intensity) · ₹20.3L / 236,400 OI-add = 42% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -3.6v · ceiling 820 (568k) RELOCATING dom1.83× · floor 800 (607k) BUILDING dom2.01×
⚑ also abnormal flow 800PE bought ₹23.9L (-1.5% OTM, +3.0v)  ·  790PE bought ₹17.5L (-0.5% OTM, +2.9v)
TATACONSUMBUYER · bullishspot 958IV 22implied ±3.6%CE buyer @ 1000 · 1.48×impl · excess-IV +6.8v · ₹4.8LOK
↷ changed from ABNORMAL-COVER (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +6.8v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.48× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹4.8L, 13% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 1000 · excess-IV +6.8v (intensity) · ₹4.8L / 63,250 OI-add = 13% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -0.8v · ceiling 1000 (475k) dom1.13× · floor 1000 (533k) ERODING dom2.71×
what has been moving
  • the ceiling had been climbing for 4 days, then turned down 10.5% today, while the stock moved -2.8% over that stretch
  • the floor has climbed 5.3% over 2 days in a row, while the stock itself barely moved (-0.4%) — the floor is moving on its own
  • the shorts are up 3.4% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • meanwhile the stock is -6.0% over the last 10 trading days
TITANBUYER · bullishspot 4628IV 22implied ±3.6%vol / strangle @ 4800 · 1.29×impl · excess-IV +10.0v · ₹39.6LLARGEVOL two-sided
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-SHORT (that tag first given 1d ago)

Vol / two-sided bet. Comparable reach buyers on BOTH sides — someone paying up (excess-IV +10.0v) for a big move EITHER way, ~1.29× the implied weekly move out. A straddle/strangle vol bet, not directional — no LONG/SHORT read. This is a LARGE position (₹39.6L, 35% of the strike's OI) — Excluded from directional expectancy; surfaced because the size expects a move.

CE buyer @ 4800 · excess-IV +10.0v (intensity) · ₹39.6L / 94,850 OI-add = 35% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -2.2v · ceiling 5000 (415k) ERODING dom1.55× · floor 4500 (268k) dom1.27×
⚑ also abnormal flow 4400PE bought ₹22.3L (+5.2% OTM, +1.3v)  ·  4500PE writer-cover ₹16.6L (+3.4% OTM, +1.7v)
TORNTPHARMBUYER · bullishspot 4832IV 22implied ±3.6%CE buyer @ 5000 · 1.16×impl · excess-IV +2.0v · ₹6.5LOK

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.0v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.16× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹6.5L, 20% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 5000 · excess-IV +2.0v (intensity) · ₹6.5L / 12,625 OI-add = 20% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -1.2v · ceiling 5000 (64k) dom1.47× · floor 4700 (40k) RELOCATING dom1.15×
⚑ also abnormal flow 4700PE bought ₹15.0L (+2.1% OTM, +1.3v)  ·  4800PE bought ₹12.1L (+0.0% OTM, +2.6v)
what has been moving
  • the longs are down 2.7% on their average buy price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 4.0% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
  • the number of open futures positions is near the top of its 25-day range (bigger than 92% of the last 25 days)
  • long positions jumped 2.7% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price rose that day it was fresh buying, and the price has turned against them since
ULTRACEMCOBUYER · bullishspot 10962IV 22implied ±3.6%CE buyer @ 11500 · 1.38×impl · excess-IV +5.1v · ₹21.4LMEDIUM
↷ changed from REVIEW (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +5.1v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.38× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a MEDIUM position (₹21.4L, 22% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 11500 · excess-IV +5.1v (intensity) · ₹21.4L / 28,450 OI-add = 22% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +3.8v · ceiling 11500 (129k) dom1.19× · floor 11000 (60k) ERODING dom2.32×
⚑ also abnormal flow 11000PE bought ₹24.2L (-1.1% OTM, +1.8v)  ·  10900PE bought ₹13.8L (+0.5% OTM, +4.4v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 2.4% over 3 days in a row, but the stock moved about the same (-1.6%) — the ceiling is just tracking price
  • the shorts just flipped to losing — now down 0.3% on their average sell price (was up 0.7%), first time in 5 days
  • short positions jumped 5.6% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
LUPINCOVER · WRITER-COVER · bullishspot 2047IV 22implied ±3.6%CE cover @ 2120 · 1.23×impl · excess-IV +5.3v · ₹22.9LOK

Informed unwind (COVER). CE writers are buying back — excess-IV +5.3v (IV rose vs surface as they paid up to close), so the ceiling is lifting. Reads bullish — a wall coming off in the crowd's face (capitulation). A OK unwind (₹22.9L, 84% of the strike's OI). This is an EXIT signal — someone's position closing, not a fresh entry — so it's shown but not expectancy-scored.

CE cover @ 2120 · WRITER-COVER — writers buying back (cap lifting / floor pulled) · bullish · excess-IV +5.3v · ₹22.9L / 111,350 OI-shed = 84% of strike OI
chain now skew -1.0v · ceiling 2100 (693k) dom2.76× · floor 2100 (435k) ERODING dom1.38×
⚑ also abnormal flow 2080PE bought ₹1.06cr (-2.5% OTM, +6.6v)  ·  2020PE bought ₹63.0L (+1.3% OTM, +6.0v)
ADANIPORTSBUYER · bearishspot 1789IV 20implied ±3.4%vol / strangle @ 1700 · 1.61×impl · excess-IV +9.7v · ₹15.5LMEDIUMVOL two-sided
↷ changed from EARLY-BUILD-LONG (that tag first given 1d ago)

Vol / two-sided bet. Comparable reach buyers on BOTH sides — someone paying up (excess-IV +9.7v) for a big move EITHER way, ~1.61× the implied weekly move out. A straddle/strangle vol bet, not directional — no LONG/SHORT read. This is a MEDIUM position (₹15.5L, 12% of the strike's OI) — Excluded from directional expectancy; surfaced because the size expects a move.

PE buyer @ 1700 · excess-IV +9.7v (intensity) · ₹15.5L / 120,650 OI-add = 12% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +9.8v · ceiling 1800 (873k) ERODING dom1.17× · floor 1700 (994k) ERODING dom1.47×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1800CE bought ₹50.5L (+1.0% OTM, +14.2v)  ·  1820CE bought ₹30.1L (+1.2% OTM, +6.3v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has climbed 3.3% over 10 days in a row, but the stock moved about the same (+3.3%) — the ceiling is just tracking price
  • long positions jumped 7.9% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price rose that day it was fresh buying, and the price has turned against them since
LICIBUYER · bullishspot 400IV 21implied ±3.4%CE buyer @ 420 · 1.85×impl · excess-IV +1.8v · ₹8.2LOK

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +1.8v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 1.85× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a OK position (₹8.2L, 12% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 420 · excess-IV +1.8v (intensity) · ₹8.2L / 362,600 OI-add = 12% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew -1.3v · ceiling 400 (2948k) dom1.0× · floor 400 (2110k) dom1.19×
⚑ also abnormal flow 390PE bought ₹11.6L (+1.4% OTM, +9.7v)
NIFTYBUYER · bullishspot 22707IV 12implied ±2.0%CE buyer @ 23000 · 0.84×impl · excess-IV +2.9v · ₹15.28crLARGE
↷ changed from ABNORMAL-COVER (that tag first given 1d ago)

Informed convex bet. A CE buyer is paying up (excess-IV +2.9v = intensity) for upside, at a strike 0.84× the implied weekly move OTM — a genuine directional reach, not at-spot noise where big size just tracks liquidity. The defined-risk, asymmetric side (capped premium loss, leveraged win). This is a LARGE position (₹15.28cr, 43% of the strike's OI) — Judge on expectancy, NOT hit rate — take the buyer's side, never fade it.

CE buyer @ 23000 · excess-IV +2.9v (intensity) · ₹15.28cr / 5,024,695 OI-add = 43% of strike OI · convex/defined-risk (score on expectancy)
chain now skew +0.5v · ceiling 24000 (22127k) dom1.04× · floor 22000 (17483k) dom1.2×
⚑ also abnormal flow 22700PE bought ₹71.34cr (+0.1% OTM, +1.4v)  ·  22700PE writer-cover ₹63.74cr (-0.3% OTM, +1.6v)
REVIEW323 new/changed · 29 continuing

Escalated — the net-OI read isn't trustworthy (churn / two-sided build); your call, not the engine's

NAUKRIspot 1221IV 30implied ±5.0%LONG · OI 46%ile

⚑ Escalated for your call. 7d regime: long-build 41% / long-unwind 38% · short-build 0→13% — regime dissolved — no bucket >50%. The net-OI read isn't trustworthy here, so the engine won't force a stamp (would-be: none). Look at the tape — distribution/handoff, or just noise?

7d regime: long-build 41% / long-unwind 38% · short-build 0→13% — regime dissolved — no bucket >50%
chain now skew +2.9v · ceiling 1340 (349k) ERODING dom1.22× · floor 1240 (176k) ERODING dom1.62×
⚑ also abnormal flow 1240CE bought ₹27.4L (-0.4% OTM, +1.7v)  ·  1260CE bought ₹12.8L (+1.2% OTM, +1.2v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 4.9% over 9 days in a row, but the stock moved about the same (-3.3%) — the ceiling is just tracking price
  • the floor had been climbing for 3 days, then turned down 4.9% today, while the stock itself barely moved (-0.6%) — the floor is moving on its own
  • the longs are down 5.3% on their average buy price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions grew 2.2% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs piling in
AMBERspot 6714IV 29implied ±4.9%LONG · OI 4%ile

⚑ Escalated for your call. 7d regime: short-cover 28% / long-build 25% / long-unwind 35% · long-build rising 0→25% (shift ≥2σ 11pp) — regime dissolved — no bucket >50%. The net-OI read isn't trustworthy here, so the engine won't force a stamp (would-be: none). Look at the tape — distribution/handoff, or just noise?

7d regime: short-cover 28% / long-build 25% / long-unwind 35% · long-build rising 0→25% (shift ≥2σ 11pp) — regime dissolved — no bucket >50%
chain now skew -2.3v · ceiling 7200 (118k) ERODING dom1.99× · floor 6700 (45k) RELOCATING dom1.27×
⚑ also abnormal flow 6700PE bought ₹37.3L (-0.4% OTM, +6.7v)  ·  6900PE bought ₹28.5L (-1.9% OTM, +3.5v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 4.5% over 10 days in a row, but the stock moved about the same (-3.9%) — the ceiling is just tracking price
  • the longs are down 5.2% on their average buy price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • open futures positions shrank 1.0% over the last 10 trading days — mostly longs closing out
  • short positions jumped 5.5% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since
ABBspot 6832IV 28implied ±4.7%SHORT · OI 4%ile

⚑ Escalated for your call. 7d regime: short-build 48% / short-cover 48% · short-build 40→48% — regime dissolved — no bucket >50%. The net-OI read isn't trustworthy here, so the engine won't force a stamp (would-be: none). Look at the tape — distribution/handoff, or just noise?

7d regime: short-build 48% / short-cover 48% · short-build 40→48% — regime dissolved — no bucket >50%
chain now skew -2.9v · ceiling 7000 (146k) RELOCATING dom1.18× · floor 6700 (100k) RELOCATING dom1.08×
⚑ also abnormal flow 6700PE bought ₹1.05cr (+1.2% OTM, +15.6v)  ·  6900PE writer-cover ₹60.1L (-0.7% OTM, +22.7v)
what has been moving
  • the ceiling has slid down 7.4% over 15 days in a row, but the stock moved about the same (-7.8%) — the ceiling is just tracking price
  • the floor has slid down 10.3% over 10 days in a row, while the stock moved -2.7% over that stretch
  • the shorts are up 5.7% on their average sell price — a bigger gap from where they got in than this stock usually runs
  • meanwhile the stock is -4.2% over the last 10 trading days
  • short positions jumped 3.7% in one day (2026-09-29) — a bigger one-day build than this stock usually shows, and since the price fell that day it was fresh short selling, and the price has turned against them since

continuing (29): ADANIENSOL d8, CROMPTON d7, IDEA d7, GVT&D d6, INDIGO d6, JINDALSTEL d6, PERSISTENT d6, SRF d6, TECHM d6, YESBANK d6, HAVELLS d5, LICHSGFIN d4, ANGELONE d3, KFINTECH d3, 360ONE d2, BDL d2, BSE d2, CIPLA d2, FORTIS d2, JUBLFOOD d2, KOTAKBANK d2, MANKIND d2, NAM-INDIA d2, NIFTYNXT50 d2, OIL d2, PAYTM d2, SHREECEM d2, ULTRACEMCO d2, UNITDSPR d2